4.5 Article

How to Produce an Alternative Carbon Source for Denitrification by Treating and Drastically Reducing Biological Sewage Sludge

期刊

MEMBRANES
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes11120977

关键词

wastewater treatment plant; sludge minimization; carbon recovery; thermophilic membrane reactor; nitrate uptake rate tests; respirometric tests; circular economy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tests on the semi-full scale Thermophilic Alternate Membrane Biological Reactor revealed high COD removal yields, low specific sludge production, and the potential for using aqueous carbon residue in denitrification processes. The ThAlMBR demonstrated compatibility with diverse sludge line points and ensured important sludge minimization in both thickened and digested biological sewage sludge.
Minimizing the biological sewage sludge (BSS) produced by wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) represents an increasingly difficult challenge. With this goal, tests on a semi-full scale Thermophilic Alternate Membrane Biological Reactor (ThAlMBR) were carried out for 12 months. ThAlMBR was applied both on thickened (TBSS) and digested biological sewage sludge (DBSS) with alternating aeration conditions, and emerged: (i) high COD removal yields (up to 90%), (ii) a low specific sludge production (0.02-0.05 kg(VS produced)/kg(CODremoved)), (iii) the possibility of recovery the aqueous carbon residue (permeate) in denitrification processes, replacing purchased external carbon sources. Based on the respirometric tests, an excellent biological treatability of the permeate by the mesophilic biomass was observed and the denitrification kinetics reached with the diluted permeate ((4.0 mgN-NO3-/(g(VSS) h)) were found comparable to those of methanol (4.4 mgN-NO3-/(g(VSS) h)). Moreover, thanks to the similar results obtained on TBSS and DBSS, ThAlMBR proved to be compatible with diverse sludge line points, ensuring in both cases an important sludge minimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据