4.5 Article

A Model System for Sensitive Detection of Viable E. coli Bacteria Combining Direct Viability PCR and a Novel Microarray-Based Detection Approach

期刊

CHEMOSENSORS
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/chemosensors9120357

关键词

E; coli; water monitoring; direct viability nested PCR; microarray-based DNA hybridization

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [13N13856, 13GW0096F]
  2. Thuringer Aufbaubank [2013FE9083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An innovative approach combining direct PCR, viability PCR, and nested PCR was established for rapid and reliable identification of Escherichia coli. The use of propidium monoazide (PMA) allowed discrimination between viable and heat-killed bacterial cells, enhancing sensitivity. The inclusion of microarray-based DNA hybridization assay provided quick and species-specific DNA detection of E. coli.
We established an innovative approach that included direct, viability, and nested PCR for rapid and reliable identification of the fecal indicator organism Escherichia coli (E. coli). Direct PCR enabled successful amplification of the target uidA gene, omitting a prior DNA isolation or purification step. Furthermore, we applied viability PCR (v-PCR) to ensure the detection of only relevant viable bacterial cells. The principle involves the binding of propidium monoazide (PMA), a selective nucleic acid intercalating dye, to accessible DNA of heat killed bacteria cells and, consequently, allows viable and heat killed E. coli cells to be discriminated. To ensure high sensitivity, direct v-PCR was followed by a nested PCR step. The resulting amplicons were analyzed by a rapid 30 min microarray-based DNA hybridization assay for species-specific DNA detection of E. coli. A positive signal was indicated by enzymatically generated silver nanoparticle deposits, which served as robust endpoint signals allowing an immediate visual readout. The presented novel protocol allows the detection of 1 x 10(1) viable E. coli cells per PCR run.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据