4.5 Review

Anti-diabetics and antimicrobials: Harmony of mutual interplay

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i11.1832

关键词

Diabetes; Immune disorders; Anti-diabetics; Antimicrobials; Anti-virulence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent research has highlighted the role of immune disorders and inflammation in the progression of diabetes, emphasizing the importance of blood glucose regulation in reducing systemic stress and inflammation. Additionally, microbial infections can exacerbate inflammation through immunity disorders, which can be reversed with antimicrobial treatment. This review focuses on the interactions between immunity, infection, and diabetes, and the potential benefits of anti-diabetic drugs with antimicrobial or anti-virulence properties.
Diabetes is one of the four major non-communicable diseases, and appointed by the world health organization as the seventh leading cause of death worldwide. The scientists have turned over every rock in the corners of medical sciences in order to come up with better understanding and hence more effective treatments of diabetes. The continuous research on the subject has elucidated the role of immune disorders and inflammation as definitive factors in the trajectory of diabetes, assuring that blood glucose adjustments would result in a relief in the systemic stress leading to minimizing inflammation. On a parallel basis, microbial infections usually take advantage of immunity disorders and propagate creating a pro-inflammatory environment, all of which can be reversed by antimicrobial treatment. Standing at the crossroads between diabetes, immunity and infection, we aim in this review at projecting the interplay between immunity and diabetes, shedding the light on the overlapping playgrounds for the activity of some antimicrobial and anti-diabetic agents. Furthermore, we focused on the anti-diabetic drugs that can confer antimicrobial or anti-virulence activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据