4.7 Article

Relationship between Urine Creatinine and Urine Osmolality in Spot Samples among Men and Women in the Danish Diet Cancer and Health Cohort

期刊

TOXICS
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics9110282

关键词

biomonitoring; urine creatinine; urine dilution; urine normalization; urine osmolality

资金

  1. NIEHS [R01ES025514, R01ES030938]
  2. Danish Cancer Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urine osmolality and creatinine are strongly correlated, with creatinine explaining 60% of the variability in osmolality. Additional 9% of the variability in osmolality is explained by urine thallium, cesium, and strontium, suggesting they can supplement creatinine for urine dilution adjustment.
Assays of urine biomarkers often use urine creatinine to account for urinary dilution, even though creatinine levels are influenced by underlying physiology and muscle catabolism. Urine osmolality-a measure of dissolved particles including ions, glucose, and urea-is thought to provide a more robust marker of urinary dilution but is seldom measured. The relationship between urine osmolality and creatinine is not well understood. We calculated correlation coefficients between urine creatinine and osmolality among 1375 members of a subcohort of the Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health Cohort, and within different subgroups. We used linear regression to relate creatinine with osmolality, and a lasso selection procedure to identify other variables that explain remaining variability in osmolality. Spearman correlation between urine creatinine and osmolality was strong overall (rho = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.89-0.91) and in most subgroups. Linear regression showed that urine creatinine explained 60% of the variability in urine osmolality, with another 9% explained by urine thallium (Tl), cesium (Cs), and strontium (Sr). Urinary creatinine and osmolality are strongly correlated, although urine Tl, Cs, and Sr might help supplement urine creatinine for purposes of urine dilution adjustment when osmolality is not available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据