4.7 Article

Effects of composition and production route on structure and catalytic activity for ammonia decomposition reaction of ternary Ni-Mo nitride catalysts

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 3854-3860

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.171

关键词

Ternary nitride; Ammonia decomposition; Evolved gas analysis; Ni2Mo3N

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [RFMEFI57814X0044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ternary Ni-Mo-N systems with high (up to 82 wt. %) content of Ni2Mo3N phase were produced by means of hydrogen reduction of different complex metal containing precursors. The precursors were obtained by two production routes, viz. evaporation and co-precipitation, with using of different initial Ni-containing salts. The samples were characterized by x-ray diffraction analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, low-temperature nitrogen adsorption, evolved gas analysis by mass spectrometry. Catalytic activity of ternary Ni-Mo nitride catalysts for ammonia decomposition reaction at atmospheric pressure and different temperatures was determined. It was established that the composition of the precursor and its production route notably influenced the relative yield of the nitride phase and specific surface area of the products. The ammonia conversion vs. temperature plot was similar for nitride catalysts with onset at 400 degrees C and full conversion at 650 degrees C. It differed only at moderate temperatures in the range from 500 degrees C to 600 degrees C with the highest conversion rate for the sample obtained by evaporation route with using of nickel acetate as precursor. It was shown that the relative catalytic activity of all obtained nitride samples were substantially higher than the activity of iron containing catalyst used as the reference material. Copyright (C) 2016, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据