4.7 Article

Thermo-physical properties of pretreated agricultural residues for bio-hydrogen production using thermo-gravimetric analysis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 5234-5242

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.079

关键词

Agricultural residue; Thermal decomposition; Kinetic parameter; Mass loss; Iso-conversion model; Bio-hydrogen production

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51376056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was conducted to investigate thermo-physical properties of pretreated agricultural residues, in order to facilitate its further processing and utilization in the biohydrogen production researches. Soybean stalk, sorghum stalk, cotton stalk, corn stover, and corncob were investigated by thermo-gravimetric analysis method. The decomposition kinetic parameters were determined by FWO, DAEM, and Kissinger methods at heating rates of 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 degrees C min(-1). Those fibers all had three mass loss steps assigned to moisture evaporation, main component decomposition, and other organic matters. Thermal stability of the fibers were all up to 200 degrees C, the peak temperature range of the decomposition process was 317.7-335.2 degrees C, and the main thermal decomposition ended about 350 degrees C when the mass loss up to 60%. The results showed that the apparent activation energy of each fiber changed along with the conversion rate, the average E-alpha, for most of selected fibers was close to each other, from 189.1 to 200.0 kJ mol(-1), except corncob. Corncob had the lowest residue content and E-alpha. Considering of the highest cumulative hydrogen yield of corncob, these findings allow developing a simplified approach to better understand the thermo-physical properties of agricultural residues in the process of biohydrogen production. Copyright (C) 2016, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据