4.6 Article

Case Report: Miles Surgery Ameliorates High Blood Pressure in a Rectal Carcinoma Patient With Essential Hypertension

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.762959

关键词

hypertension; miles surgery; sympathetic tone; gut microbiota-brain axis; case report

资金

  1. Nurture projects for basic research of Shanghai Chest Hospital [2020YNJCQ01, 2020YNJCM08]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82173812, 82104161]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypertension is closely related to gastrointestinal function, and gut intervention may play a significant role in regulating blood pressure. After Miles surgery for rectal carcinoma, a patient with long-term hypertension saw a return to normal blood pressure levels, possibly due to modulation of sympathetic tone and the gut microbiota-brain axis. This report provides evidence of the relevance between hypertension and gut intervention, particularly in the colorectal sites, offering insights for investigating the possible mechanisms of hypertension and novel strategies for blood pressure control.
Hypertension is one of the major causes of public health problems. Multiple factors affecting gastrointestinal tract function are involved in hypertension. Emerging studies have manifested that gut intervention may play significant roles in regulating blood pressure but the underlying mechanisms are complex and not fully clear. Here, we report a case of 66 years old male who had a long history of hypertension and received Miles surgery for rectal carcinoma. The blood pressure of this patient was returned to normal levels after the operation. The possible reasons could be the modulation of sympathetic tone and the gut microbiota-brain axis. This report provides evidence about the relevance between hypertension and gut intervention particularly in the colorectal sites and gives hints for investigating the possible mechanisms of hypertension and the novel strategy for blood pressure control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据