4.6 Article

Pigmentation Affects Elastic Fiber Patterning and Biomechanical Behavior of the Murine Aortic Valve

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.754560

关键词

atomic force microscopy; echocardiography; pigment; extracellular matrix; elastin

资金

  1. Florida Heart Research Foundation
  2. Florida International University Graduate School
  3. NSF [CBET 1454544]
  4. FIU CASE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates the importance of pigmentation in organizing elastic fibers and dictating biomechanical properties of the aortic valve in mice.
The aortic valve (AoV) maintains unidirectional blood distribution from the left ventricle of the heart to the aorta for systemic circulation. The AoV leaflets rely on a precise extracellular matrix microarchitecture of collagen, elastin, and proteoglycans for appropriate biomechanical performance. We have previously demonstrated a relationship between the presence of pigment in the mouse AoV with elastic fiber patterning using multiphoton imaging. Here, we extended those findings using wholemount confocal microscopy revealing that elastic fibers were diminished in the AoV of hypopigmented mice (Kit(Wv) and albino) and were disorganized in the AoV of K5-Edn3 transgenic hyperpigmented mice when compared to wild type C57BL/6J mice. We further used atomic force microscopy to measure stiffness differences in the wholemount AoV leaflets of mice with different levels of pigmentation. We show that AoV leaflets of K5-Edn3 had overall higher stiffness (4.42 +/- 0.35 kPa) when compared to those from Kit(Wv) (2.22 +/- 0.21 kPa), albino (2.45 +/- 0.16 kPa), and C57BL/6J (3.0 +/- 0.16 kPa) mice. Despite the striking elastic fiber phenotype and noted stiffness differences, adult mutant mice were found to have no overt cardiac differences as measured by echocardiography. Our results indicate that pigmentation, but not melanocytes, is required for proper elastic fiber organization in the mouse AoV and dictates its biomechanical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据