4.6 Article

Electrocardiogram-Based Heart Age Estimation by a Deep Learning Model Provides More Information on the Incidence of Cardiovascular Disorders

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.754909

关键词

artificial intelligence; electrocardiography; deep learning; cardiovascular diseases; chronological age

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 108-2314-B-016-001, MOST 109-2314-B-016-026, MOST110-2314-B-016-010-MY3, MOST 106-2314-B-016-038-MY3]
  2. Tri-Service General Hospital, Taiwan [TSGH-C107-007-007-S02]
  3. National Science and Technology Development Fund Management Association, Taiwan [MOST 108-3111-Y-016-009, MOST 109-3111-Y-016-002]
  4. Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taiwan [CHNDMC-109-19, CHNDMC-110-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a deep learning model to predict the biological age of the heart using ECG and explored its contribution to future cardiovascular diseases. The results showed that ECG age was associated with increased risks of various cardiovascular diseases, including mortality, heart failure, and stroke.
ObjectiveThe biological age progression of the heart varies from person to person. We developed a deep learning model (DLM) to predict the biological age via ECG to explore its contribution to future cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). MethodsThere were 71,741 cases ranging from 20 to 80 years old recruited from the health examination center. The development set used 32,707 cases to train the DLM for estimating the ECG-age, and 8,295 cases were used as the tuning set. The validation set included 30,469 ECGs to follow the outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-cause mortality, heart failure (HF), diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke (STK), coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation (AF), and hypertension (HTN). Two independent external validation sets (SaMi-Trop and CODE15) were also used to validate our DLM. ResultsThe mean absolute errors of chronologic age and ECG-age was 6.899 years (r = 0.822). The higher difference between ECG-age and chronological age was related to more comorbidities and abnormal ECG rhythm. The cases with the difference of more than 7 years had higher risk on the all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 1.61, 95% CI: 1.23-2.12], CV-cause mortality (HR: 3.49, 95% CI: 1.74-7.01), HF (HR: 2.79, 95% CI: 2.25-3.45), DM (HR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.53-1.89), CKD (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.41-1.97), AMI (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.20-2.57), STK (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.42-1.92), CAD (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12-1.37), AF (HR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.86-3.04), and HTN (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.51-1.85). The external validation sets also validated that an ECG-age >7 years compare to chronologic age had 3.16-fold risk (95% CI: 1.72-5.78) and 1.59-fold risk (95% CI: 1.45-1.74) on all-cause mortality in SaMi-Trop and CODE15 cohorts. The ECG-age significantly contributed additional information on heart failure, stroke, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation predictions after considering all the known risk factors. ConclusionsThe ECG-age estimated via DLM provides additional information for CVD incidence. Older ECG-age is correlated with not only on mortality but also on other CVDs compared with chronological age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据