4.6 Article

PCSK9/LDLR System and Rheumatoid Arthritis-Related Atherosclerosis

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.738764

关键词

rheumatoid arthritis; cardiovascular disease; inflammation; PCSK9; LDLR

资金

  1. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD)
  2. Hellenic Foundation for Research Innovation (HFRI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals the significant role of the PCSK9/LDLR system in atherosclerosis related to rheumatoid arthritis, suggesting its potential use as a screening tool for disease progression in the future.
Background/Aims: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with the emergence of cardiovascular disease, while chronic inflammation is considered a common denominator for their parallel progression. The Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)/LDL-Receptor (LDLR) system is of high importance during atherogenesis, via regulating the clearance of LDL from the circulation; nevertheless the role of this molecular mechanism during RA-related atheromatosis is not known. Methods: Herein, high-resolution ultrasound measurements for arterial hypertrophy, atheromatosis and arterial stiffness as well as comprehensive biochemical profiling were performed in 85 RA patients. The circulating levels of PCSK9 and LDLR were measured and their potential associations as well as of the PCSK9/LDLR ratio with patients' characteristics and the degree of atherosclerosis were investigated. Results: Increased LDLR levels and decreased PCSK9/LDLR ratio were found in RA patients with at least 2 atheromatic plaques as compared to the ones without any plaques. In addition the levels of both PCSK9 and LDLR were positively correlated with the presence of atheromatic plaques as an age- and gender- adjusted multivariate analysis revealed. Conclusions: Our data imply that the PCSK9/LDLR system plays a significant role during RA-related atherosclerosis and may therefore be used as a screening tool for disease progression in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据