4.7 Article

Thermal analysis of moving porous fin wetted by hybrid nanofluid with trapezoidal, concave parabolic and convex cross sections

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.101757

关键词

Moving porous fin; Hybrid nanofluid; Different cross-sections; Magnetic field; AGM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the thermal performance of a moving porous fin wetted with hybrid nanofluid with different cross-sections in the presence of a magnetic field. Three different cross-sections (trapezoidal, concave parabolic, and convex) are used as an innovation. The impact of various characteristics on the dimensionless temperature is thoroughly examined, and the results show that Akbari-Ganji's method has good accuracy in solving heat transfer equations related to moving porous fin.
In this study, the thermal performance of moving porous fin wetted with hybrid nanofluid with different cross-sections in the presence of a magnetic field is investigated. As an innovation, three different cross-sections) trapezoidal, concave parabolic and convex (have been used. The Shape-factor effect of hybrid nanoparticles is also considered in the equations. After extracting the governing equations and converting the PDE equations to ODE by Similarity solution, the equations are solved by Akbari-Ganji's method. The boundary conditions are an insulated tip with a finite length, and thermal functions for heat transfer coefficient and conductivity have been assumed. The impacts of several characteristics on the dimensionless temperature are thoroughly investigated, including Peclet number, thermal conductivity parameter, emissivity parameter, heat transfer coefficient parameter, convective-conductive parameter, and radiative-conductive parameter. The results show that Akbari-Ganji's method has good accuracy in solving heat transfer equations related to moving porous fin. Also, increasing the Peclet number increases the dimensionless temperature, because increasing the Peclet number causes the fin to move faster.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据