4.7 Article

Computational case study on tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid flow: Single phase thermal investigation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101246

关键词

Tangent hyperbolic-hybrid nanofluid; Temperature dependent thermal conductivity; Heat source; Entropy optimization; Finite difference method

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University [RGP.1/58/42]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the flow and thermal transfer properties of hybrid nanofluid via a slippery surface, finding that the heat transfer level of TiO2-Cu/EG hybrid combo continuously increases. By integrating nanoparticles ratio, the entropy system is enlarged due to fractional size, radiative variant, thermal conductance, and the Weissenberg number.
Heat transmission is inevitable in industrial and manufacturing processes. The hybrid nanofluid with its advanced thermal exponent due to the two-part nanoparticle which helps to boost the thermal transfer capacity of standard nanofluids to achieve it. The flow and thermal transference properties of hybrid nanofluid of such kind via a slippery surface has investigated in this study. The pore mediums, heat source, viscous dissipation, thermal conducting variants, and thermal radiative impacts were explored. The controlled equations are solved using the finite difference numerical methodology. The hybrid Tangent hyperbolic nanofluid, which is made up of viscous non-Newtonian fluid EG (ethylene glycol) and two types of nano-solid particles of copper (Cu) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been studied. It's worth noting that, when compared to the conventional nanofluid (Cu-EG), the heat transfer level of TiO2-Cu/EG hybrid combo has been continuously increased. The thermal efficiency of TiO2-Cu/EG over Cu-EG is realized with a least of 1.4% and supreme of 3.3%. By integration of nanoparticles ratio, the entropy system is enlarged due to fractional size, radiative variant, thermal conductance and the Weissenberg number.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据