4.7 Article

Thermodynamic analysis of solid oxide electrolyzer integration with engine waste heat recovery for hydrogen production

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101240

关键词

Solid oxide electrolyzer; Water electrolysis; Hydrogen production; Waste heat recovery; Thermodynamic analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51706112]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China [LY20E060001]
  3. foundation of National Key Laboratory of China [6142808200203]
  4. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2018YFB1502204]
  5. K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water electrolysis using SOEC has high efficiency and can be integrated with thermal sources to reduce electricity consumption. Integration of a diesel engine with SOEC can increase efficiency and optimize system parameters.
Water electrolysis based on solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) exhibits high conversion efficiency due to part of energy demand can be derived from thermal energy. Therefore, it can be integrated with other sources of thermal energy to reduce the consumption of electrical energy. In this paper, a diesel engine is integrated with the SOEC stacks for heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). The thermal energy from the engine exhaust gas used to heat the inlet H2O of the SOEC is carried out as the integration case. A SOEC plant using electricity as the thermal heat input is selected as the base case. Thermodynamic analysis of the benchmark and integration scheme reveals that an electrical efficiency of 73.12% and 85.17% can be achieved, respectively. The diesel to power efficiency can be increased to 70% when the exhaust gas is completely utilized by the SOEC system. The impacts of some key parameters, including current density and operating temperature on system performance have also been conducted and found that the system has optimized parameters of current density and operating temperature to achieve better performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据