4.7 Article

Connecting MHC-I-binding motifs with HLA alleles via deep learning

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02716-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 109-2221-e-002-161-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a deep learning-based framework called MHCfovea to connect HLA alleles with binding motifs, expanding the knowledge of MHC-I binding motifs and revealing critical polymorphic residues that determine binding preference. It provided valuable information for antigen discovery and vaccine design in terms of allele specificity.
The selection of peptides presented by MHC molecules is crucial for antigen discovery. Previously, several predictors have shown impressive performance on binding affinity. However, the decisive MHC residues and their relation to the selection of binding peptides are still unrevealed. Here, we connected HLA alleles with binding motifs via our deep learning-based framework, MHCfovea. MHCfovea expanded the knowledge of MHC-I-binding motifs from 150 to 13,008 alleles. After clustering N-terminal and C-terminal sub-motifs on both observed and unobserved alleles, MHCfovea calculated the hyper-motifs and the corresponding allele signatures on the important positions to disclose the relation between binding motifs and MHC-I sequences. MHCfovea delivered 32 pairs of hyper-motifs and allele signatures (HLA-A: 13, HLA-B: 12, and HLA-C: 7). The paired hyper-motifs and allele signatures disclosed the critical polymorphic residues that determine the binding preference, which are believed to be valuable for antigen discovery and vaccine design when allele specificity is concerned. Ko-Han Lee et al. develop MHCfovea, a machine-learning method for predicting peptide-binding by MHC molecules and inferring peptide motifs and MHC allele signatures. They demonstrate that MHCfovea is capable of detecting meaningful hyper-motifs and allele signatures, making it a useful resource for the community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据