4.6 Article

Laboratory Selection of Trypanosomatid Pathogens for Drug Resistance

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph15020135

关键词

Trypanosoma brucei; Trypanosoma cruzi; Leishmania; drug resistance; in vitro cultivation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the experimental methods and strategies for selecting drug-resistant parasites, using African trypanosomes as an example. Researchers need to consider factors such as the environmental conditions, life stages, and pressure for selecting drug resistance, while taking into account the laboratory settings.
The selection of parasites for drug resistance in the laboratory is an approach frequently used to investigate the mode of drug action, estimate the risk of emergence of drug resistance, or develop molecular markers for drug resistance. Here, we focused on the How rather than the Why of laboratory selection, discussing different experimental set-ups based on research examples with Trypanosoma brucei, Trypanosoma cruzi, and Leishmania spp. The trypanosomatids are particularly well-suited to illustrate different strategies of selecting for drug resistance, since it was with African trypanosomes that Paul Ehrlich performed such an experiment for the first time, more than a century ago. While breakthroughs in reverse genetics and genome editing have greatly facilitated the identification and validation of candidate resistance mutations in the trypanosomatids, the forward selection of drug-resistant mutants still relies on standard in vivo models and in vitro culture systems. Critical questions are: is selection for drug resistance performed in vivo or in vitro? With the mammalian or with the insect stages of the parasites? Under steady pressure or by sudden shock? Is a mutagen used? While there is no bona fide best approach, we think that a methodical consideration of these questions provides a helpful framework for selection of parasites for drug resistance in the laboratory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据