4.6 Article

Limitations and Challenges in the Stability of Cysteamine Eye Drop Compounded Formulations

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph15010002

关键词

cysteamine; ocular cystinosis; stability; eye drop formulations

资金

  1. Recordati Rare Diseases Spain through university-enterprise collaboration [UCM: 564-2019-A-2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cysteamine eye drops, commonly used for treating patients with cystinosis, have high instability in aqueous solution, which may compromise their clinical efficacy. This study analyzed the stability of different formulations of cysteamine eye drops and found that they had high degradation rates at the end of their shelf life.
Accumulation of cystine crystals in the cornea of patients suffering from cystinosis is considered pathognomonic and can lead to severe ocular complications. Cysteamine eye drop compounded formulations, commonly prepared by hospital pharmacy services, are meant to diminish the build-up of corneal cystine crystals. The objective of this work was to analyze whether the shelf life proposed for six formulations prepared following different protocols used in hospital pharmacies is adequate to guarantee the quality and efficacy of cysteamine eye drops. The long-term and in-use stabilities of these preparations were studied using different parameters: content of cysteamine and its main degradation product cystamine; appearance, color and odor; pH and viscosity; and microbiological analysis. The results obtained show that degradation of cysteamine was between 20% and 50% after one month of storage in the long-term stability study and between 35% and 60% in the in-use study. These data confirm that cysteamine is a very unstable molecule in aqueous solution, the presence of oxygen being the main degradation factor. Saturation with nitrogen gas of the solutions offers a means of reducing cysteamine degradation. Overall, all the formulae studied presented high instability at the end of their shelf life, suggesting that their clinical efficacy might be dramatically compromised.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据