4.7 Article

Novel KLK4 Mutations Cause Hypomaturation Amelogenesis Imperfecta

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020150

关键词

whole exome sequencing; kallikrein 4; amelogenesis imperfecta; genetic diseases; hypomaturation; zymography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, two novel mutations in the KLK4 gene were identified in four Turkish families with hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta. Functional analysis revealed that these mutations resulted in the production of either an inefficient or unstable protein. This study enhances our understanding of the normal and pathological mechanisms of enamel formation.
Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a group of rare genetic diseases affecting the tooth enamel. AI is characterized by an inadequate quantity and/or quality of tooth enamel and can be divided into three major categories: hypoplastic, hypocalcified and hypomaturation types. Even though there are some overlapping phenotypes, hypomaturation AI enamel typically has a yellow to brown discoloration with a dull appearance but a normal thickness indicating a less mineralized enamel matrix. In this study, we recruited four Turkish families with hypomaturation AI and performed mutational analysis using whole exome sequencing. These analyses revealed two novel homozygous mutations in the KLK4 gene: a nonsense mutation in exon 3 (NM_004917.4:c.170C>A, p.(Ser57*)) was found in families 1, 2 and 3 and a missense mutation in exon 6 (c.637T>C, p.(Cys213Arg)) in family 4. Functional analysis showed that the missense mutation transcript could not translate the mutant protein efficiently or generated an unstable protein that lacked functional activity. The two novel inactivating KLK4 mutations we identified caused a hypomaturation AI phenotype similar to those caused by the four previously described KLK4 nonsense and frameshift mutations. This study improves our understanding of the normal and pathologic mechanisms of enamel formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据