4.7 Article

A murine model of cerebral cavernous malformations with acute hemorrhage

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103943

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (project EC-ERC-VEPC) [742922]
  2. Telethon (New Insight on the Pathogenesis of Hereditary Cerebral Cavernous Malformation) [GGP19202]
  3. AIFA (A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial on Propranolol in Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformation) [AIFA-2016-02364593]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [742922] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cavernomas are vascular malformations that form in the brain and spinal cord, causing symptoms such as hemorrhage and epileptic seizures. Current murine models have limitations in reproducing the characteristics of the human disease. A newly characterized murine model recapitulates features of human cavernomas, providing a preclinical model for developing drugs to treat acute hemorrhage.
Cavernomas are multi-lumen and blood-filled vascular malformations which form in the brain and the spinal cord. They lead to hemorrhage, epileptic seizures, neurological defi zits, and paresthesia. An effective medical treatment is still lacking, and the available murine models for cavernomas have several limitations for predinical studies. These include disease phenotypes that differ from human diseases, such as restriction of the lesions to the cerebellum, and absence of acute hemorrhage. Additional limitations of current murine models include rapid development of lesions, which are lethal before the first month of age. Here, we have characterized a murine model that recapitulates features of the human disease: lesions develop after weaning throughout the entire CNS, including the spinal cord, and undergo acute hemorrhage. This provides a preclinical model to develop new drugs for treatment of acute hemorrhage in the brain and spinal cord, as an unmet medical emergency for patients with cavernomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据