4.7 Article

Multi-omics reveals microbiome, host gene expression, and immune landscape in gastric carcinogenesis

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103956

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [NRF-2021R1C1C1005728]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the complex relationships between the intragastric microbiome and gastric mucosal gene expression in gastric carcinogenesis were analyzed using multi-omic approaches. Unique associations specific to different disease states were uncovered, providing new insights into the mechanisms underlying gastric cancer development. The study provides the most comprehensive description of microbial, host transcriptomic, and immune cell factors in the pathway of gastric carcinogenesis.
To date, there has been no multi-omic analysis characterizing the intricate relationships between the intragastric microbiome and gastric mucosal gene expression in gastric carcinogenesis. Using multi-omic approaches, we provide a comprehensive view of the connections between the microbiome and host gene expression in distinct stages of gastric carcinogenesis (i.e., healthy, gastritis, cancer). Our integrative analysis uncovers various associations specific to disease states. For example, uniquely in gastritis, Helicobacteraceae is highly correlated with the expression of FAM3D, which has been previously implicated in gastrointestinal inflammation. In addition, in gastric cancer but not in adjacent gastritis, Lachnospiraceae is highly correlated with the expression of UBD, which regulates mitosis and cell cycle time. Furthermore, lower abundances of B cell signatures in gastric cancer compared to gastritis may suggest a previously unidentified immune evasion process in gastric carcinogenesis. Our study provides the most comprehensive description of microbial, host transcriptomic, and immune cell factors of the gastric carcinogenesis pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据