4.7 Article

Coexistence of the hourglass and nodal-line dispersions in Nb3SiTe6 revealed by ARPES

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103952

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0405800, 2017YFA0402901]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2032153, 21727801, 11621063, U1932201]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB25000000]
  4. International Partnership Program of CAS [211134KYSB20190063]
  5. Collaborative Innovation Program of Hefei Science Center, CAS [2019HSC-CIP007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The non-symmorphic crystal symmetry protection in the layered topological semimetal Nb3SiTe6 can generate exotic band crossings. In this study, high-quality Nb3SiTe6 single crystal was synthesized and its lattice structure and topological properties were characterized using various characterization techniques. The results reveal the presence of unique band crossings and node lines in Nb3SiTe6, providing important clues for further understanding and exploring its topological properties.
The non-symmorphic crystal symmetry protection in the layered topological semimetal Nb3SiTe6 can generate exotic band crossings. Herein, high-quality Nb3SiTe6 single crystal was synthesized via chemical vapor transport. The lattice structure of Nb3SiTe6 was characterized by scanning transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, core-level photoemission, and Raman spectroscopies. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy was used to reveal its topological properties by presenting band structures along different high-symmetry directions. Our data show that nontrivial band features coexist in Nb3SiTe6, including an hourglass-type dispersion formed by two bands along the S-R high-symmetry line, two node lines along the S-X path and the S-R-U path, respectively. These results provide a context for the understanding and exploration of the exotic topological properties of Nb3SiTe6.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据