4.7 Article

Electrolyte Additive cis-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydrophthalic Anhydride Enhanced the Cycle Life of Nickel-Rich LiNi0.9Co0.05Mn0.05O2

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 11, 页码 12275-12284

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c02085

关键词

cis-,1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride; electrolyte additive; LiNi0.90Co0.05Mn0.05O2; electrode/electrolyte interphase; lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2020J06004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrolyte additive THPA enhances the interfacial stability of Ni-rich NCM90 cathode, generating an integrated and compact cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) film, thereby boosting the capacity retention to 93.2% after 120 cycles.
Nickel (Ni)-rich LiNixCoyMnzO2 (NCM, x >= 0.9) cathode materials are gaining widespread attention owing to their higher energy density than conventional cathodes, such as LiCoO2 and LiFePO4. Unfortunately, the industrial application of Ni-rich NCM materials is still restrained by the unsatisfactory electrochemical properties resulting from the unstable cathode structure and the cathode/electrolyte interface. Here, we propose an electrolyte additive, cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride (THPA) to enhance the interfacial stability of the Nirich LiNi0.90Co0.05Mn0.05O2 (NCM90) cathode. It is demonstrated that additive THPA is more preferable to be oxidized at the cathode as well as to be reduced at the anode, hindering the unwanted oxidation of carbonate solvents. An integrated and compact cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) film is generated in the presence of a 2.0% THPA additive, mitigating the parasitic interfacial reactions, suppressing the buildup of interfacial resistance, and somewhat inhibiting the intragranular cracks. Consequently, the capacity retention of NCM90 with an electrolyte containing 2.0% THPA is boosted to 93.2% after 120 cycles at 1C (1C = 180 mA g(-1)) at 30 degrees C, well exceeding 80.0% obtained with the baseline electrolyte.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据