4.7 Article

Improved Hydrogen Production Rate of a Nickel-Doped Zinc Indium Oxysulfide Visible-Light Catalyst: Comparative Study of Stoichiometric and Nonstoichiometric Compounds

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 1755-1766

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c03200

关键词

photocatalysts; nonstoichiometric; phase transformation; hydrogen evolution; spinel structure

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST) [MOST-110-2221-E-011-100-MY3, MOST-110-2221-E-011-070-MY3, MOST-110-2811-E-011-507, MOST-109-2811-E-011-503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study systematically investigates the effect of nickel doping on the crystal structure and photocatalytic hydrogen production of ZnInOS/In(OH)(3) nanocomposite. It is found that nickel doping can transform the crystal structure and enhance the hydrogen production rate. The 10% nickel-doped ZI-50 catalyst shows the highest hydrogen evolution reaction rate.
Photocatalytic hydrogen production has been considered as one of the effective methods to produce hydrogen as a green energy carrier in the future. This report systematically investigates the effect of nickel doping on the crystal structure, optical properties, and photocatalytic hydrogen production rate of the ZnInOS/In(OH)(3) nanocomposite (denoted as ZI-50). It is found that nickel doping could transform the phase of ZI-50 from two phases of ZnInOS and In(OH)(3) into a single phase with a ZnIn2S4 spinel structure. More importantly, all Ni-doped ZI-50 catalysts are nonstoichiometric and highly defective with a Zn(Zn,Ni,In)(2)(O,S)(4-x) spinel structure. 10% nickel precursor-doped ZI-50 as the best catalyst can achieve the highest hydrogen evolution reaction rate of 1700 mu mol/g.h, which is much higher than those of Ni-free ZI-50 (340 mu mol/g.h) and stoichiometric ZnIn2S4 (110 mu mol/g.h). A kinetic mechanism for enhancing photocatalytic hydrogen evolution based upon the cationic antisite defects and anionic oxygen vacancy was proposed and explained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据