4.5 Article

Allometric conservatism in the evolution of bird beaks

期刊

EVOLUTION LETTERS
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 83-91

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/evl3.267

关键词

Allometry; bird beaks; constraints; evolutionary conservatism

资金

  1. NERC [NE/S00713X/1, NE/T01105X/1, NE/T000139/1]
  2. European Research Council [615709]
  3. Royal Society University Research Fellowship [URF\R\180006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the allometric relationships in the evolution of bird beaks across millions to tens of millions of years, finding that the relationship between beak size and body size remains relatively conserved among species. However, occasional shifts occur in the slopes and intercepts of these relationships, contributing to the vast diversity of beak size relative to body size observed in birds today.
Evolution can involve periods of rapid divergent adaptation and expansion in the range of diversity, but evolution can also be relatively conservative over certain timescales due to functional, genetic-developmental, and ecological constraints. One way in which evolution may be conservative is in terms of allometry, the scaling relationship between the traits of organisms and body size. Here, we investigate patterns of allometric conservatism in the evolution of bird beaks with beak size and body size data for a representative sample of over 5000 extant bird species within a phylogenetic framework. We identify clades in which the allometric relationship between beak size and body size has remained relatively conserved across species over millions to tens of millions of years. We find that allometric conservatism is nonetheless punctuated by occasional shifts in the slopes and intercepts of allometric relationships. A steady accumulation of such shifts through time has given rise to the tremendous diversity of beak size relative to body size across birds today. Our findings are consistent with the Simpsonian vision of macroevolution, with evolutionary conservatism being the rule but with occasional shifts to new adaptive zones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据