4.7 Article

Resistivity saturation in Kondo insulators

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS PHYSICS
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42005-021-00723-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [LINRETRACE P 30213-N36]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kondo insulators exhibit characteristic low-temperature saturation in resistivity, potentially due to the finite lifetimes of intrinsic bulk carriers. Metallic surface states may serve as a likely source of residual conduction. At low temperature, in addition to the charge gap, the scattering rate becomes a relevant energy scale, leading to invalidation of the semi-classical Boltzmann picture.
Kondo insulators exhibit a characteristic low-temperature saturation in resistivity the reasons for which have so far eluded physical explanation. Here, using many-body simulations the authors propose an alternative mechanism where the finite lifetimes of the intrinsic bulk carriers play an integral role. Resistivities of heavy-fermion insulators typically saturate below a characteristic temperature T*. For some, metallic surface states, potentially from a non-trivial bulk topology, are a likely source of residual conduction. Here, we establish an alternative mechanism: at low temperature, in addition to the charge gap, the scattering rate turns into a relevant energy scale, invalidating the semi-classical Boltzmann picture. Then, finite lifetimes of intrinsic carriers drive residual conduction, impose the existence of a crossover T*, and control-now on par with the gap-the quantum regime emerging below it. Assisted by realistic many-body simulations, we showcase the mechanism for the Kondo insulator Ce3Bi4Pt3, for which residual conduction is a bulk property, and elucidate how its saturation regime evolves under external pressure and varying disorder. Deriving a phenomenological formula for the quantum regime, we also unriddle the ill-understood bulk conductivity of SmB6-demonstrating a wide applicability of our mechanism in correlated narrow-gap semiconductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据