4.7 Article

Detection of Cytopathic Effects Induced by Influenza, Parainfluenza, and Enterovirus Using Deep Convolution Neural Network

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010070

关键词

artificial intelligence; cytopathic effect; ResNet-50

资金

  1. NCTU (National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan)
  2. KMU (Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan)
  3. NCTU-KMU JOINT RESEARCHPROJECT [NCTU-KMU-109-AI-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, artificial intelligence was used to improve the efficiency of virus identification by analyzing virus-induced cytopathic effects through deep learning. The accuracies of the single and multi-task learning models were high, and the multi-task learning model was able to increase the accuracy of the single model with limited data. This research provides a feasible solution for virus identification.
The isolation of a virus using cell culture to observe its cytopathic effects (CPEs) is the main method for identifying the viruses in clinical specimens. However, the observation of CPEs requires experienced inspectors and excessive time to inspect the cell morphology changes. In this study, we utilized artificial intelligence (AI) to improve the efficiency of virus identification. After some comparisons, we used ResNet-50 as a backbone with single and multi-task learning models to perform deep learning on the CPEs induced by influenza, enterovirus, and parainfluenza. The accuracies of the single and multi-task learning models were 97.78% and 98.25%, respectively. In addition, the multi-task learning model increased the accuracy of the single model from 95.79% to 97.13% when only a few data of the CPEs induced by parainfluenza were provided. We modified both models by inserting a multiplexer and de-multiplexer layer, respectively, to increase the correct rates for known cell lines. In conclusion, we provide a deep learning structure with ResNet-50 and the multi-task learning model and show an excellent performance in identifying virus-induced CPEs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据