4.7 Article

Synergistic Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells Reveals Prognostic Signatures in Pilot Study of Treatment-Naive Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010146

关键词

CTC; liquid biopsy; pancreatic cancer; mutant KRAS; gene expression profiling

资金

  1. NIH [R01-CA-208335-01-A1]
  2. NSF [DGE 1256260]
  3. V.S. Lefkofsky Scholar award
  4. Rogel Scholar award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were isolated and analyzed to identify signatures related to survival and treatment response in pancreatic cancer patients. The findings highlight the importance of characterizing these markers to improve patient care and overcome treatment resistance mechanisms.
Simple Summary Pancreatic cancer is one of the most deadly cancer types because it usually is not diagnosed until the cancer has spread throughout the body. In this study, we isolate cancer cells found in the blood of pancreatic cancer patients called circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to study their mutation and gene expression profiles. Comparing patients with better and worse survival duration revealed signatures found in these cancer cells. Characterizing these signatures may help improve patient care by using alternative treatment options. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is typically diagnosed at late stages and has one of the lowest five-year survival rates of all malignancies. In this pilot study, we identify signatures related to survival and treatment response found in circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Patients with poor survival had increased mutant KRAS expression and deregulation of connected pathways such as PI3K-AKT and MAPK signaling. Further, in a subset of these patients, expression patterns of gemcitabine resistance mechanisms were observed, even prior to initiating treatment. This work highlights the need for identifying patients with these resistance profiles and designing treatment regimens to circumvent these mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据