4.7 Article

Collagenase-Induced Patellar Tendinopathy with Neovascularization: First Results towards a Piglet Model of Musculoskeletal Embolization

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010002

关键词

patellar tendon; tendinopathy; neovascularization; embolization; animal model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully developed a new large animal model for studying patellar tendinopathy with neovascularization. After collagenase injection, tendons enlarged and new vessels formed, showing a dose-related correlation with collagenase dose.
Background: Therapeutic strategies targeting neovessels responsible for musculoskeletal chronic pain have emerged, including neovessels embolization. Our study aimed to develop a large animal model of patellar tendinopathy with neovascularization. Methods: Nine 3-month-old male piglets (18 patellar tendons) received percutaneous injections of increasing doses of collagenase (0 to 50 mg) at day 0 (D0). Tendinopathy was evaluated by ultrasound (D7 and D14). Neovascularization was evaluated visually and on angiographies. Bonar score was used for histological analysis (D14). Correlations were evaluated using Spearman's rank (Rs) test. Results: Research protocol was well tolerated. All tendons were enlarged with a median increase of 31.58% [25-40.28] at D7 (p = 0.244) at D7 and 57.52% [48.41-91.45] at D14 (p = 0.065). Tendons with collagenase injection had more hypoechoic changes, with one tendon rupture (p = 0.012). Neovascularization was reported above 5 mg collagenase (p < 0.01) at D7 and D14 with dose-related neovessels induction (Rs = 0.8, p < 0.001). The Bonar score increased above 5 mg collagenase, correlated with the dose (Rs = 0.666, p = 0.003). Conclusions: The study shows the feasibility, safety and reproducibility of this new large animal model of patellar tendinopathy with neovascularization after collagenase injection. It will allow studying new treatments on direct embolization of neovessels by endovascular approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据