4.7 Article

Vaccinia Virus: From Crude Smallpox Vaccines to Elaborate Viral Vector Vaccine Design

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9121780

关键词

cross-protection; poxvirus; VACV; recombinant MVA; genetic engineering; immune-evasive genes; host-range-related genes; viral vector vaccines

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [812915]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [GK1949/2]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [812915] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various strains of vaccinia virus were used to eradicate smallpox virus globally. Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) is a popular vaccine strain with advantages for developing recombinant vaccine candidates. By manipulating certain genes, researchers aim to improve the immunogenicity and safety of MVA-based viral vector vaccines.
Various vaccinia virus (VACV) strains were applied during the smallpox vaccination campaign to eradicate the variola virus worldwide. After the eradication of smallpox, VACV gained popularity as a viral vector thanks to increasing innovations in genetic engineering and vaccine technology. Some VACV strains have been extensively used to develop vaccine candidates against various diseases. Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) is a VACV vaccine strain that offers several advantages for the development of recombinant vaccine candidates. In addition to various host-restriction genes, MVA lacks several immunomodulatory genes of which some have proven to be quite efficient in skewing the immune response in an unfavorable way to control infection in the host. Studies to manipulate these genes aim to optimize the immunogenicity and safety of MVA-based viral vector vaccine candidates. Here we summarize the history and further work with VACV as a vaccine and present in detail the genetic manipulations within the MVA genome to improve its immunogenicity and safety as a viral vector vaccine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据