4.7 Article

Unravelling the Role of PAX2 Mutation in Human Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9121808

关键词

PAX2; focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; induced pluripotent stem cells; podocytes; ureteric bud

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study on a patient with familial steroid-resistant FSGS identified a PAX2 mutation, suggesting a dual effect of the mutation in the onset of FSGS. Fixing the mutation improved the functionality of podocytes, providing insight into the development of proteinuria in FSGS.
No effective treatments are available for familial steroid-resistant Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), characterized by proteinuria due to ultrastructural abnormalities in glomerular podocytes. Here, we studied a private PAX2 mutation identified in a patient who developed FSGS in adulthood. By generating adult podocytes using patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), we developed an in vitro model to dissect the role of this mutation in the onset of FSGS. Despite the PAX2 mutation, patient iPSC properly differentiated into podocytes that exhibited a normal structure and function when compared to control podocytes. However, when exposed to an environmental trigger, patient podocytes were less viable and more susceptible to cell injury. Fixing the mutation improved their phenotype and functionality. Using a branching morphogenesis assay, we documented developmental defects in patient-derived ureteric bud-like tubules that were totally rescued by fixing the mutation. These data strongly support the hypothesis that the PAX2 mutation has a dual effect, first in renal organogenesis, which could account for a suboptimal nephron number at birth, and second in adult podocytes, which are more susceptible to cell death caused by environmental triggers. These abnormalities might translate into the development of proteinuria in vivo, with a progressive decline in renal function, leading to FSGS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据