4.5 Review

Evidence-based urology: understanding GRADE methodology

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 1230-1233

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.09.014

关键词

GRADE; Systematic review; Clinical practice guidelines; Urology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GRADE is a rigorous and transparent framework for grading the certainty of evidence and making recommendations. Recommendations can be strong or weak for or against an intervention, based on factors like evidence certainty, desirable and undesirable outcomes, patient values, and resource use. This approach is essential for guideline development in healthcare.
Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) is a methodologically rigorous and transparent framework for grading the certainty of evidence and moving from evidence to recommendations in guidelines. Certainty of evidence can be rated as high, moderate, low, or very low, and some domains may lead to an increase or decrease in the certainty of evidence. Once evidence is summarized, the certainty, balance of desirable and undesirable outcomes, patients' values and preferences, equity, acceptability, and feasibility are taken into consideration in order to give a strong or weak recommendation for or against an intervention. In this review we summarize the GRADE approach using urology-related examples. Patient summary: GRADE is a well-established system for determining how much confidence we can place in research evidence and how guideline panels can make recommendations for patient care and health care policy. Recommendations can be strong or weak for or against a treatment strategy. Guideline developers should consider the certainty of the evidence, the balance of desirable and undesirable outcomes, patients' values and preferences, and resource use. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据