4.5 Article

The feasibility of domestic raintanks contributing to community-oriented urban flood resilience

期刊

CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100390

关键词

Raintank; Urban Flood Resilience; Community; Action research; Stormwater; Engagement

资金

  1. UKRI's Strategic Priority Fund for Climate Resilience [NE/S016589/1]
  2. TWENTY65 research consortium [EP/N010124/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the feasibility of implementing a domestic raintank programme for increasing urban flood resilience. Hydrological modelling and socio-cultural interviews reveal the advantages and challenges of raintank models, as well as the potential for a community-oriented approach to flood resilience that promotes mutual learning and two-way communication.
This interdisciplinary study investigates the technical and social feasibility of developing a domestic raintank programme to increase urban flood resilience. Hydrological modelling of different types of tank was used to determine the advantages and disadvantages of different models in controlling runoff. Qualitative socio-cultural interviews with local people revealed that raintanks were broadly acceptable to the local community. However, interviews with representatives from flood authorities suggest that resource constraints and technocratic industry norms focused on physical flood risk mitigate against consideration of a raintank programme. Our research suggests that there are transformative advantages to a more community-oriented approach to flood resilience, particularly the potential to change the relationship between the public and flood authorities away from a traditional model that pictures the former as passive, towards a process of mutual learning and two-way communication. Our research illustrates that this is not merely a matter of 'good practice', but a shift that can produce new practical solutions that a technical perspective alone cannot reveal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据