4.7 Article

Hydrogen sensing properties of Pt/Pd bimetal decorated on highly hydrophobic Si nanowires

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 41, 期 25, 页码 10991-11001

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.124

关键词

Hydrophobic Si nanowires; Pt/Pd bimetal; Hydrogen sensor; Fast response-recovery time; PLD; Metal assisted chemical etching

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning [NRF-2014R1A2A2A01002668]
  2. MOTIE (Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy), Korea under Eco-friendly Fuel Cell Test-bed program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes the synthesis of Pt/Pd bimetal decorated highly hydrophobic rough silicon nanowires (Si NWs) by using a facile metal assisted chemical etching and pulse laser deposition (PLD) process. In addition, the potential of the Si NWs as a new hydrogen (H-2) detection matrix was investigated. The Pt/Pd bimetal was coated as a discrete ultra thin film manner in a semi-dense configuration over the basal podium and along the length of vertical-standing and semi-densely distributed rough Si NW clusters. The resulting structure showed significant advantages in H-2 sensing performances such as a large detection range of 1-40,000 ppm, high response magnitude of nearly 5.02%, and fast response-recovery time of 7/7 s to 10,000 ppm (1 vol%) hydrogen concentration at an optimum operating temperature of 75 degrees C. The observed characteristics of fast response recovery time could relate to the enhanced hydrogen-induced changes in the work function of the Pt/Pd bimetal decorated Si NWs (Pt/Pd-Si NWs), which were configured as an array matrix comprising of many nanowire clusters with variable distances between the two electrodes. Finally, the fabricated sensor showed excellent repeatability towards (1 vol %) hydrogen concentration. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据