Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals

IMPORTANCE In October 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services began requiring US hospitals to report adherence to the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of SEP-1 implementation with sepsis treatment patterns and outcomes in diverse hospitals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study with interrupted time-series analysis and logistic regression models was conducted among adults admitted to 114 hospitals from October 2013 to December 2017 with suspected sepsis (blood culture orders, >= 2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, and acute organ dysfunction) within 24 hours of hospital arrival. Data analysis was conducted from September 2020 to September 2021. EXPOSURES SEP-1 implementation in the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was quarterly rates of risk-adjusted short-term mortality (in-hospital death or discharge to hospice). Secondary outcomes included lactate testing and administration of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics within 24 hours of hospital arrival. Generalized estimating equations with robust sandwich variances were used to fit logistic regression models to assess for changes in level or trends in these outcomes, adjusting for baseline characteristics and severity of illness. RESULTS The cohort included 117 510 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 years [55-78] years; 60 530 [51.5%] men and 56 980 [48.5%] women) with suspected sepsis. Lactate testing rates increased from 55.1%(95% CI, 53.9%-56.2%) in Q4 of 2013 to 76.7%(95% CI, 75.4%-78.0%) in Q4 of 2017, with a significant level change following SEP-1 implementation (odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.74). There were increases in use of anti-MRSA antibiotics (19.8%[95% CI, 18.9%-20.7%] in Q4 of 2013 to 26.3%[95% CI, 24.9%-27.7%] in Q4 of 2017) and antipseudomonal antibiotics (27.7%[95% CI, 26.7%-28.8%] in Q4 of 2013 to 40.5%[95% CI, 38.9%-42.0%] in Q4 of 2017), but these trends preceded SEP-1 and did not change with SEP-1 implementation. Unadjusted short-term mortality rates were similar in the pre-SEP-1 period (Q4 of 2013 through Q3 of 2015) vs the post-SEP-1 period (Q1 of 2016 through Q4 of 2017) (20.3%[95% CI, 20.0%-20.6%] vs 20.4%[95% CI, 20.1%-20.7%]), and SEP-1 implementation was not associated with changes in level (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.68-1.29) or trend (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.04) for risk-adjusted short-term mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, SEP-1 implementation was associated with an immediate increase in lactate testing rates, no change in already-increasing rates of broad-spectrum antibiotic use, and no change in short-term mortality rates for patients with suspected sepsis. Other approaches to decrease sepsis mortalitymay be warranted.

Automated summary

The study evaluated the impact of implementing SEP-1 on sepsis treatment patterns and outcomes in diverse hospitals. The results showed an immediate increase in lactate testing rates after SEP-1 implementation, while there were no significant changes in broad-spectrum antibiotic use rates and short-term mortality rates for patients with suspected sepsis.