4.5 Article

A study of QCD radiation in VBF Higgs production with VINCIA and PYTHIA

期刊

SCIPOST PHYSICS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SCIPOST FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.1.010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Monash eResearch Centre through the MonARCH HPC Cluster
  2. Monash eSolutions-Research Support Services through the MonARCH HPC Cluster
  3. Australian Research Council [DP170100708]
  4. Monash Graduate Scholarship
  5. Monash International Postgraduate Research Scholarship
  6. J.L. William Scholarship
  7. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab), a U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, HEP User Facility
  8. Fermi Research Alliance, LLC (FRA) [DE-AC02-07CH11359]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we discuss and illustrate the properties of several parton-shower algorithms available in PYTHIA and VINCIA in the context of Higgs production via vector boson fusion (VBF). We study a set of observables sensitive to the coherent radiation pattern of additional jets and compare different algorithms. Additionally, we investigate the robustness of these predictions as higher-order perturbative matrix elements are incorporated.
We discuss and illustrate the properties of several parton-shower algorithms available in PYTHIA and VINCIA, in the context of Higgs production via vector boson fusion (VBF). In particular, the distinctive colour topology of VBF processes allows to define observables sensitive to the coherent radiation pattern of additional jets. We study a set of such observables, using the VINCIA sector-antenna shower as our main reference, and contrast it to PYTHIA's transverse-momentum-ordered DGLAP shower as well as PYTHIA's dipole-improved shower. We then investigate the robustness of these predictions as successive levels of higher-order perturbative matrix elements are incorporated, including next-to-leading-order matched and tree-level merged calculations, using POWHEG BOX and SHERPA respectively to generate the hard events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据