4.6 Article

Integrative multiomics-histopathology analysis for breast cancer classification

期刊

NPJ BREAST CANCER
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00357-y

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH [T32 HG002295]
  2. NVIDIA
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH [R35GM142879]
  4. Blavatnik Center for Computational Biomedicine Award
  5. Harvard Data Science Fellowship
  6. Pfizer
  7. Genentech
  8. Seattle Genetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed deep learning models to examine the connections between visual morphological signals in breast cancer and genetic statuses, achieving strong predictive performance in clinical subtyping and gene expression analysis.
Histopathologic evaluation of biopsy slides is a critical step in diagnosing and subtyping breast cancers. However, the connections between histology and multi-omics status have never been systematically explored or interpreted. We developed weakly supervised deep learning models over hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained slides to examine the relations between visual morphological signal, clinical subtyping, gene expression, and mutation status in breast cancer. We first designed fully automated models for tumor detection and pathology subtype classification, with the results validated in independent cohorts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve >= 0.950). Using only visual information, our models achieved strong predictive performance in estrogen/progesterone/HER2 receptor status, PAM50 status, and TP53 mutation status. We demonstrated that these models learned lymphocyte-specific morphological signals to identify estrogen receptor status. Examination of the PAM50 cohort revealed a subset of PAM50 genes whose expression reflects cancer morphology. This work demonstrates the utility of deep learning-based image models in both clinical and research regimes, through its ability to uncover connections between visual morphology and genetic statuses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据