4.6 Article

Oncogene-mediated metabolic gene signature predicts breast cancer outcome

期刊

NPJ BREAST CANCER
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00341-6

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Canary Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (NCI) [R37CA240822, R01CA244281]
  3. NIH [S10 OD023518-01A1]
  4. Higher Education Institutional Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary, within the Semmelweis University [2020-4.1.1.-TKP2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrated the overexpression of Trop2 in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the oncogenic role of Trop2 in breast cancer; through metabolic gene signature analysis, a five-gene metabolic signature associated with Trop2 was identified, which significantly predicts poor survival in TNBC patients; the new metabolic gene signature serves as an accurate predictor of breast cancer outcome.
Breast cancer remains the second most lethal cancer among women in the United States and triple-negative breast cancer is the most aggressive subtype with limited treatment options. Trop2, a cell membrane glycoprotein, is overexpressed in almost all epithelial cancers. In this study, we demonstrate that Trop2 is overexpressed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and downregulation of Trop2 delays TNBC cell and tumor growth supporting the oncogenic role of Trop2 in breast cancer. Through proteomic profiling, we discovered a metabolic signature comprised of TALDO1, GPI, LDHA, SHMT2, and ADK proteins that were downregulated in Trop2-depleted breast cancer tumors. The identified oncogene-mediated metabolic gene signature is significantly upregulated in TNBC patients across multiple RNA-expression clinical datasets. Our study further reveals that the metabolic gene signature reliably predicts poor survival of breast cancer patients with early stages of the disease. Taken together, our study identified a new five-gene metabolic signature as an accurate predictor of breast cancer outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据