4.6 Article

Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene

期刊

NPJ QUANTUM MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41535-021-00410-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC from the Thomas Young Centre [EP/L015579/1]
  2. EPSRC Thomas Young Centre [EP/S025324/1, TYC-101]
  3. Imperial College London Research Computing Service
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [RTG 1995, SPP 2244, EXC2004/1 - 390534769]
  5. Max Planck-New York City Center for Non Equilibrium Quantum Phenomena
  6. RWTH Aachen University [rwth0589, rwth0595]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene is a highly tunable platform for studying correlated phases of matter. In this research, we find that spin fluctuations play an important role in superconductivity, and we discover new features in the phase diagram of the superconducting state.
Magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene (MATTG) recently emerged as a highly tunable platform for studying correlated phases of matter, such as correlated insulators and superconductivity. Superconductivity occurs in a range of doping levels that is bounded by van Hove singularities, which stimulates the debate of the origin and nature of superconductivity in this material. In this work, we discuss the role of spin-fluctuations arising from atomic-scale correlations in MATTG for the superconducting state. We show that in a phase diagram as a function of doping (nu) and temperature, nematic superconducting regions are surrounded by ferromagnetic states and that a superconducting dome with T-c approximate to 2 K appears between the integer fillings nu = -2 and nu = -3. Applying a perpendicular electric field enhances superconductivity on the electron-doped side which we relate to changes in the spin-fluctuation spectrum. We show that the nematic unconventional superconductivity leads to pronounced signatures in the local density of states detectable by scanning tunneling spectroscopy measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据