4.7 Review

Defects and stability of perovskite solar cells: a critical analysis

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 400-417

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1qm01250a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal halide perovskite solar cells have achieved power conversion efficiencies exceeding 25.5%, similar to silicon solar cells, but their stability remains a challenge for commercialization due to degradation from external factors. Encapsulation can suppress degradation from oxygen and moisture, however, light and heat-induced degradation are still issues that need to be addressed for improved stability.
Metal halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) continue to improve their power conversion efficiency to over 25.5%, which is at the same level as silicon solar cells. The stability of perovskite cells is a challenging issue for the commercialization of this photovoltaic technology. The degradation of PSCs is mainly due to external environmental factors, such as oxygen, moisture, light, and heat. The degradation of PSCs by oxygen and moisture can be suppressed through the encapsulation of devices. However, encapsulation cannot reduce light and heat degradation under the operating conditions. In this Review, we mainly focus on the analysis of degradation mechanisms caused by light and heat. Compositional and interfacial engineering of perovskite material lattice sites are the most widely applied strategy to alleviate the degradation of PSCs. The improvements in PSC stability and device efficiency are also reviewed for defect passivation at charge transport layer/perovskite interfaces with various materials such as polymers, small molecules, quantum dots, ligands, charge-transporting layers dopants, and post-treatment of the perovskite film. This Review will help to understand the degradation mechanism of PSCs and improve their stability under illumination. We believe that this Review will help with the design the optimal PSCs for highly efficient and stable devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据