4.7 Article

Performance Improvement of Gallium-Doped Passivated Emitter and Rear Cells by Two-Step Bias Application

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202100738

关键词

bias applications; gallium doping; hydrogen behaviors; PERC solar cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62025403, 61974129, 61721005]
  2. Visiting Scholars Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials [SKL2020-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The two-step postfiring bias treatment can significantly enhance the efficiency of commercial gallium-doped PERC solar cells by up to 0.1%, with positive biasing followed by negative biasing resulting in an average efficiency enhancement of around 0.05% each. A new model involving hydrogen behavior under electric field is proposed to explain the mechanism behind the efficiency improvement from the bias treatments.
Passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) solar cells have dominated the photovoltaic market in recent years. Continuously improving the efficiency of PERC solar cells is of great importance to enable the goal of low electricity cost, which is cheaper than the cost of thermal power generation. Herein, it is demonstrated that a two-step postfiring bias treatment is able to evidently enhance the efficiency of commercial gallium-doped PERC solar cells by up to 0.1% absolute. In detail, the first-step bias treatment is done by forward biasing the PERC solar cells at 12 A and 200 degrees C for 60 min, resulting in an average efficiency enhancement at around 0.05% absolute. The second-step bias treatment is done by reverse biasing the PERC solar cells at -0.1 or -0.2 V and at the elevated temperatures for certain times, leading to another average efficiency enhancement at around 0.05% absolute. To explore the mechanism underlying the two-step bias treatments on improving cell efficiency, a new model in light of hydrogen behavior under electric field is proposed to explain this phenomenon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据