4.7 Article

Phenyl Extended Naphthalene-Based Covalent Triazine Frameworks as Versatile Metal-Free Heterogeneous Photocatalysts

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202100848

关键词

covalent triazine frameworks; extended conjugation; heterogeneous photocatalysis; metal-free photocatalysts; microwave synthesis; naphthalene moieties

资金

  1. ERDF A way of making Europe [MAT2017-82288-C2-2-P, PID2020-112590GB-C22, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]
  2. Ministerio de Universidades [FPU17/03463]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two new covalent triazine frameworks incorporating phenyl extended naphthalene units have been prepared using thermal and microwave activation. These frameworks show similar chemical structures but exhibit differences in morphology, structural organization, CO2 adsorption capacity, and thermal and optical properties. Additionally, the presence of methoxy groups in the naphthalene core has an influence on some of these properties. The resulting phenyl extended naphthalene CTFs are utilized as metal-free heterogeneous photocatalysts for selective reactions under visible-light irradiation, demonstrating high chemical stability.
Two new covalent triazines frameworks (CTFs) containing phenyl extended naphthalene units (with and without methoxy groups in the naphthalene core) are prepared by thermal and microwave activation. Both procedures yield similar chemical structures combining triazine acceptor units with donor aromatic groups, but they generate some differences in the morphology, structural organization, CO2 adsorption capacity, and thermal and optical properties. Besides, the methoxy groups of the naphthalene core have also influence in some of these properties. The resulting phenyl extended naphthalene CTFs are efficiently utilized as metal-free heterogeneous photocatalyst for the selective aerobic oxidation of sulfides and the dehydrogenative cross-coupling reactions under visible-light irradiation, showing a high chemical stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据