4.7 Article

Early identification of disease progression in ALK-rearranged lung cancer using circulating tumor DNA analysis

期刊

NPJ PRECISION ONCOLOGY
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41698-021-00239-3

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. German Center for Lung Research (DZL)
  2. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)
  3. Heidelberg Center for Personalized Oncology at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ-HIPO)
  4. Roche Sequencing Solutions (Pleasanton, CA, USA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized various sequencing technologies to analyze plasma DNA from 43 ALK+ NSCLC patients receiving ALK-directed therapies, finding that 51% of these patients had ALK-related alterations. Evidence for early detection of disease progression is crucial for guiding patient management and therapy decisions.
Targeted kinase inhibitors improve the prognosis of lung cancer patients with ALK alterations (ALK+). However, due to the emergence of acquired resistance and varied clinical trajectories, early detection of disease progression is warranted to guide patient management and therapy decisions. We utilized 343 longitudinal plasma DNA samples from 43 ALK+ NSCLC patients receiving ALK-directed therapies to determine molecular progression based on matched panel-based targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS), and shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS). ALK-related alterations were detected in 22 out of 43 (51%) patients. Among 343 longitudinal plasma samples analyzed, 174 (51%) were ctDNA-positive. ALK variant and fusion kinetics generally reflected the disease course. Evidence for early molecular progression was observed in 19 patients (44%). Detection of ctDNA at therapy baseline indicated shorter times to progression compared to cases without mutations at baseline. In patients who succumbed to the disease, ctDNA levels were highly elevated towards the end of life. Our results demonstrate the potential utility of these NGS assays in the clinical management of ALK+ NSCLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据