4.8 Article

Rebound in China's coastal wetlands following conservation and restoration

期刊

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
卷 4, 期 12, 页码 1076-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-021-00793-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41630528, 32030067]
  2. US National Science Foundation [1911955]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021TQ0072, BX20200094, 2020M681164]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province [2017GXNSFBA198009]
  5. China Scholarship Council [201906100124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coastal zone of China has seen significant increases in population, economy, and urbanization since the early 1980s. A study analyzing Landsat images from 1984 to 2018 found a decrease in coastal wetland area between 1984 and 2011, with a substantial increase in saltmarsh area and stable tidal flat area since 2012. These findings are crucial for improving coastal wetland management and sustainability in China.
The coastal zone of China has experienced large increases in population, economy and urbanization since the early 1980s. Many studies have reported the loss, degradation and fragmentation of coastal wetlands in China at local to regional scales. To date, at the national scale, our knowledge of the spatial distribution, inter-annual variation and multi-decadal trends of coastal wetlands in China remains very limited. Here we analysed -62,000 Landsat-5, -7 and -8 images over the period 1984-2018 and generated maps of coastal wetlands for individual years in China at 30-m spatial resolution. We found that coastal wetland area significantly decreased between 1984 and 2011. We also found a substantial increase in saltmarsh area and a stable trend of tidal flat area since 2012, driven by reduced anthropogenic activities and increased conservation and restoration efforts. These coastal wetland maps for the period 1984-2018 are invaluable for improvement of coastal wetland management and sustainability in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据