4.6 Article

Decreasing the catalytic ignition temperature of diesel soot using electrified conductive oxide catalysts

期刊

NATURE CATALYSIS
卷 4, 期 12, 页码 1002-1011

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41929-021-00702-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22076062, 21876061, 22072170, 21906063]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-JSC037]
  3. Fujian Institute of Innovation, Chinese Academy of Sciences [FJCXY18020202]
  4. LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1802076]
  5. Key Technology R&D Program of Shandong Province [2019GSF109042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have successfully decreased the ignition temperature of soot combustion through an electrification strategy, leading to efficient combustion at low temperatures and improving catalyst efficiency. This method shows promising potential for reducing vehicle emissions at low exhaust temperatures.
Pursuance of low reaction temperatures deserves considerable efforts in regard to catalysis for energy efficiency. Catalytic soot combustion, the prevailing technology for reducing the emission of harmful diesel soot particulates, cannot occur efficiently at <200 degrees C exhaust temperature during frequent idling. Here, we report an electrification strategy aimed at decreasing the ignition temperature at which 50% of soot (T-50) is converted at <75 degrees C using conductive oxides as catalysts, such as potassium-supported antimony-tin oxides. The performance achieved was far superior to that with conventional thermal catalytic soot combustion-generally with T-50 >300 degrees C. Electrically driven release of lattice oxygen from catalysts is responsible for rapid soot ignition at low temperatures, while the opposite electrostatic fluidization between the conductive catalyst and soot particles accounts for improved catalyst-soot contact efficiency. The electrification process presents a promising strategy in meeting the common dilemma of reduction in vehicle emissions at low exhaust temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据