4.3 Article

The role of Smad6 in immunity of the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata martensii

期刊

JOURNAL OF OCEANOLOGY AND LIMNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 1135-1147

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s00343-021-1088-8

关键词

Smad6; BMP2-Smads signal pathway; expression; immunity; Pinctada fucata martensii

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2019A1515011968]
  2. Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of the Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) [GML2019ZD0401]
  3. Earmarked Fund for the Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [CARS-49]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2020B1212060058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that Smad6 in mollusks, specifically in the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata martensii, plays a role in immunity. It has a positive effect in the immune response to challenges, but inhibits the wound healing process. Smad6 and Smad3 may have opposing functions.
Inhibitory Smads (I-Smads), which belong to the Smad family and inhibit bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP2) signaling by a variety of mechanisms, can suppress innate immunity responses in vertebrates. However, there are no reports for the role of Smad6 in immunity in mollusks. In this study, we showed that Smad6 of the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata martensii was located in the Smad6 cluster of the phylogenetic tree; mRNA expression of Smad6 and Smad3 was up-regulated after lipopolysaccharide and polyinosinic: polycytidylic challenge; and transcript levels of Smad6 and Smad3 showed opposite patterns during wound healing. Under salinity stress, water inflow and outflow in the gills appear to be regulated by BMP2-Smads signals, and BMP2-Smads signaling may be closely related to the immune response. Our results indicate that Smad6 is involved in immunity, that it plays a positive role in the response to immune challenge and an inhibitory role during wound healing, and that Smad6 and Smad3 may work against each other.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据