4.3 Article Data Paper

Ground beetle fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Mordovia State Nature Reserve (Russia)

期刊

BIODIVERSITY DATA JOURNAL
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e69807

关键词

biodiversity; Coleoptera; Carabidae; pitfall traps; Republic of Mordovia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presented 2,969 new occurrence records of 226 species of Carabidae from the Mordovia State Nature Reserve in central Russia, with 10 species listed for the first time in the reserve. This new information contributes important data to the biodiversity study of the region.
Background Protected areas are organised in different climatic zones, which usually include typical ecosystems characteristic of certain climatic zones. In most cases, protected areas are biodiversity hotspots. These areas are benchmarks in terms of nature conservation and to determine their biological diversity is becoming an important task. It is important to investigate the carabid family of protected areas within the framework of understanding the overall biological diversity of these systems. In addition, ground beetles, as one of the largest groups of ground-based inhabitants, are indicators of the state of ecosystems and serve as markers of their well-being. New information We present 2,969 new occurrence records comprising 226 species of Carabidae, belonging to eight subfamilies, from the Mordovia State Nature Reserve (central Russia). Ten species are listed for the first time for the Mordovia State Nature Reserve fauna after previous research: Cicindela maritima, Bembidion striatum, Dyschirius angustatus, Dyschirius arenosus, Notiophilus aestuans, Bembidion argenteolum, Bembidion velox, Bradycellus caucasicus, Cymindis angularis and Syntomus truncatellus, five of which were first recorded for the Republic of Mordovia (Egorov et al. 2020). Previously, this information was not published anywhere and we wanted to make it available to everyone by embedding it in the global database on biodiversity (GBIF).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据