4.7 Article

The Influence of Student Engagement on Mathematical Achievement among Secondary School Students

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10010041

关键词

mathematics achievement; affective engagement; cognitive engagement; behavioural engagement; student engagement

资金

  1. Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia [GG-2020-026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Student engagement is a crucial factor in predicting mathematical achievement, with affective engagement being the strongest predictor followed by behavioral engagement and cognitive engagement. Policymakers should develop curriculum to enhance affective and behavioral engagement, and school administrators and teachers should plan and implement activities to stimulate student engagement.
Student engagement is a multidimensional construct that predicts learning performance. However, student engagement receives limited attention, especially in mathematics. Thus, this study conducts a survey to determine the influence of student engagement on mathematical achievement. Stratified random sampling was employed to select secondary school students (n = 1000). Questionnaires and end-of-year examination grades were collected as data on student engagement and respective mathematics achievement. The findings indicate that there is a significant relationship between cognitive engagement, affective engagement, behavioural engagement, and mathematical achievement. The results of multiple linear regression analysis show that affective engagement is the largest predictor of mathematical achievement (beta = 0.743, p < 0.001), followed by behavioural engagement (beta = 0.585, p < 0.001), and cognitive engagement (beta = -0.375, p < 0.01). This suggests that policymakers should formulate a curriculum that enables the improvement of affective and behavioural engagement. Furthermore, this study recommends that school administrators and teachers plan and implement activities that stimulate such engagement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据