4.7 Article

A Three-Stage ACO-Based Algorithm for Parallel Batch Loading and Scheduling Problem with Batch Deterioration and Rate-Modifying Activities

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10040657

关键词

scheduling; batching; ant colony optimization; mixed linear integer programming; deterioration; rate-modifying activity

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2019R1F1A1056119]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper tackles the problem of minimizing makespan on parallel batch processing machines through batch loading and scheduling. A three-stage ant colony optimization algorithm is proposed, which found optimal solutions for small-sized problems and achieved near-optimal solutions for large-sized problems, outperforming genetic algorithm or particle swarm optimization algorithms.
This paper addresses a batch loading and scheduling problem of minimizing the makespan on parallel batch processing machines. For batch loading, jobs with compatible families can be assigned to the same batch process even if they differ in size; however, batches can only be formed from jobs within the same family, and the batch production time is determined by the family. During the batch scheduling, the deterioration effects are continuously added to batches processed in each parallel machine so that the batch production times become deteriorated. The deteriorated processing time of batches can be recovered to the original processing times of batches by a maintenance or cleaning process of machines. In this problem, we sequentially determine the batching of jobs and the scheduling of batches. Due to the complexity of the problem, we proposed a three-stage ant colony optimization algorithm. The proposed algorithm found an optimal solution for small-sized problems and achieved near-optimal solutions and better performance than a genetic algorithm or a particle swarm optimization for large-sized problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据