4.7 Article

PDF-based modeling on the turbulent convection heat transfer of supercritical CO2 in the printed circuit heat exchangers for the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.03.001

关键词

Turbulent convective heat transfer; Printed circuit heat exchanger; Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle; Probability density function; Numerical simulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51406166]
  2. Key Programs of China Huaneng Group [HNKJ15-H07]
  3. Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental and numerical investigations on forced convection heat transfer of supercritical CO2 within a semi-circular printed circuit heat exchanger have been performed in the present study. Primary operational parameters included inlet pressure of 7.5 MPa to 8.5 MPa, mass fluxes ranged from 160 kg/m(2)s to 760 kg/m2s and the average heat fluxes of 20 kW/m(2) to 90 kW/m(2). A physically improved semi-empirical correlation for the forced convection heat transfer of supercritical CO2 within the PCHE was developed by implementing probability density function (PDF)-based property revised technique for more reasonably interpreting the influence of the instantaneous turbulent temperature and fluctuating properties. The comparison results showed that the simple DB correlation could not reproduce the experiments and the Jackson correlation with the properties ratio correction terms could qualitatively capture the heat transfer features under different working conditions, however, it still overestimated the average value of the heat transfer coefficients in the whole range of the working conditions. The predictions of the PDF-based new developed correlation are significantly improved so that more than 96% data in the heating mode and more than 92% data in the cooling mode with various heat fluxes are captured and collapsed to an ideal straight line within an accuracy of 25%. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据