4.7 Article

Robust Multivariate Shewhart Control Chart Based on the Stahel-Donoho Robust Estimator and Mahalanobis Distance for Multivariate Outlier Detection

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 9, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math9212772

关键词

multivariate control charts; Mahalanobis distance; control chart; Hotelling T-2; Stahel-Donoho robust estimators; outlier detection

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DRS) at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) [SB191047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a robust multivariate control chart based on the Stahel-Donoho robust estimator, and examines how parameter estimation and outliers impact the efficacy of control charts through Monte-Carlo simulations. The new outlier detector restores the sensitivity and efficacy of the chart, as demonstrated in a real-life application on a dataset from the manufacturing process of carbon fiber tubes.
While researchers and practitioners may seamlessly develop methods of detecting outliers in control charts under a univariate setup, detecting and screening outliers in multivariate control charts pose serious challenges. In this study, we propose a robust multivariate control chart based on the Stahel-Donoho robust estimator (SDRE), whilst the process parameters are estimated from phase-I. Through intensive Monte-Carlo simulation, the study presents how the estimation of parameters and presence of outliers affect the efficacy of the Hotelling T-2 chart, and then how the proposed outlier detector brings the chart back to normalcy by restoring its efficacy and sensitivity. Run-length properties are used as the performance measures. The run length properties establish the superiority of the proposed scheme over the default multivariate Shewhart control charting scheme. The applicability of the study includes but is not limited to manufacturing and health industries. The study concludes with a real-life application of the proposed chart on a dataset extracted from the manufacturing process of carbon fiber tubes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据