4.7 Article

G3 Shape Adjustable GHT-Bezier Developable Surfaces and Their Applications

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 9, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math9192350

关键词

GHT-Bezier developable surface; shape-adjustable property; shape parameters; continuity of surfaces; duality

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [FRGS/1/2020/STG06/USM/03/1]
  2. School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a novel method for constructing generalized hybrid trigonometric (GHT-Bezier) developable surfaces, which allows for the establishment of a class of GHT-Bezier developable surfaces with different shape control parameters and possess many properties of GHT-Bezier surfaces. The article also derives the continuity conditions between GHT-Bezier developable surfaces.
In this article, we proposed a novel method for the construction of generalized hybrid trigonometric (GHT-Bezier) developable surfaces to tackle the issue of modeling and shape designing in engineering. The GHT-Bezier developable surface is obtained by using the duality principle between the points and planes with GHT-Bezier curve. With different shape control parameters in their domain, a class of GHT-Bezier developable surfaces can be established (such as enveloping developable GHT-Bezier surfaces, spine curve developable GHT-Bezier surfaces, geodesic interpolating surfaces for GHT-Bezier surface and developable GHT-Bezier canal surfaces), which possess many properties of GHT-Bezier surfaces. By changing the values of shape parameters the effect on the developable surface is obvious. In addition, some useful geometric properties of GHT-Bezier developable surface and the G(1), G(2) (Farin-Boehm and Beta) and G(3) continuity conditions between any two GHT-Bezier developable surfaces are derived. Furthermore, various useful and representative numerical examples demonstrate the convenience and efficiency of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据